Audit an Invasion of Privacy?

The request that high government officials undergo an annual IRS audit seems to be a reasonable request, and most people I’ve discussed it with think it’s a good idea. We need some minimum oversight on those with access to almost unlimited money and power. Recent history shows that there’s dirt under the Congressional rug, and we just need to pull up the corner and look to find it.

Several times I’ve heard the objection that an annual IRS audit, with the subsequent public availability of a summary of the results, is an invasion of our government official’s privacy. This position has it that government officials have the right to the presumption of innocence, that we shouldn’t audit them unless we have probable cause.

This argument should be easily dealt with, as in our society rights are often sacrificed in favor of a Greater Public Good. In this case, the Greater Public Good is restoring some of the basic trust in our Government. That trust has been lost over many years as trusted public officials have been revealed to have been cheating on their tax obligations, in addition to other types of cheating and dishonesty. The Greater Public Good here also involves ensuring that those who hold the greatest power over other people’s lives are responsible enough to pay their fair share of taxes. If they are not responsible enough to pay their taxes, then they certainly are not responsible enough to be a Congressman.

Compared to the burden Congress has imposed on other ordinary citizens who hold positions of far lesser authority and impact, this is truly the minimum requirement we could impose. Consider the range of positions and occupations which Congress has allowed or mandated much more severe invasions of privacy, all in the name of the Greater Public Good. Positions from pilots to military servicemen to police and firemen to ordinary government employees are subject to invasive inquiries ranging from random drug tests to periodic background checks. 

There would be a great deal of irony if Congress insisted upon these measures for others, but claimed privacy rights for themselves. A dishonest, tax cheating Congressman is a far greater danger to the Republic than others in public service who must trade their privacy for the Greater Public Good. A dishonest Congressman hurts all Americans and our Republic.  I say it's time to start demanding of them the bare minimum of accountability, an annual tax audit!

Come on Congressmen, Man Up!  Volunteer to be audited every year, and help restore American’s trust in their government.

Dan Murphy

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 2/16/2009 7:49 PM JasperPants wrote:
    I would suggest one step futher for all of our elected officials:

    - Once elected, official gooes into financial lockdown
    - Government auditors have full, ongoing access to all financial dealings, bank accounts, real estate transactions od said officials
    - Oversight continues for three years after leaving office
    - pay these officials well...500K minimum, no other compensation no pension
    Reply to this
  • 2/16/2009 9:05 PM jim wickersham wrote:
    how bout 1 more step.lets do a "gov't " idea. lets let some federal beauacracy collect all campaign fun ds. donor must notate with contribution where he/she/it wishes the dollars to go, therefore we know who's really doing the contributing and to who for what.. and by the way,might this be a way of who shld be recusing themselves on some votes? hey about even gov't taxxing it as income. hahahha,yeah,fat chance. and if they won't go for all that. HOW ABOUT SOME REAL LAWS STATING PUNISHMENT FOR WHEN THEY ARE CAUGHT, AND LET OUTSIDE ORG. DOLE OUT THE PUNISHMENTS INSTEAD OF THEM DOING IT THEMSELVES.

    thnx,

    jim.
    i feel better now
    Reply to this
  • 2/17/2009 11:00 AM Justin wrote:
    Good luck getting them to voluntarily submit. Ultimately it may only be possible to achieve this through ground up effort. Get it down locally, then at the state level, then force the feds.
    Reply to this
  • 2/17/2009 1:50 PM JasperPants wrote:
    Great follow-up ideas. I especially like the campaign contribution one.

    My view on that is that if contibution limits cannot stick because of First Amendment reasons, or because of loopholes, then contributions should be cleared through a 3rd party and elected officials should be recused from voting when their contributors are directly affected by legislation.

    Who said anything about this being voluntary?

    The next time a politician wants to pass a law to restrict our freedom, we should ask the question: What freedoms are you going to give up, sir? Perhaps this can be a mantra.

    I would love to see some form of political reformation done along these lines. It would change the game dramatically.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.